The Autumn of the Patriarch Review Essay Example

The Autumn of the Patriarch Review Paper Essay on The Autumn of the Patriarch In the early 1970s, the American linguist Hayden White has identified five pathways that are present in scientific texts: 1. Romance. 2. tragedy. 3. Comedy. 4. Satire. 5. Epic. Satire is mocking romance, tragedy and comedy, and is actually a deconstruction of the text, revealing discourse (consciously or unconsciously) and the destruction of the creative subject. Epos is a creation of a new mythology. These trails are not unique, and even does the scientific literature, but rather literature. Major subjects on which the literature, were formed more than 2.5 thousand. Years ago in the OT. This is mainly a problem of meaning of human life, and in this respect the modern writers did not invent anything new. I was no exception and GG Marquez. The name of the product first refers to the concept of the Patriarch, as the head of the clan (hence the state). However, Marquez played with us, because there is uncertain given a hint of the biblical patriarchs (Adam, Noah, Abraham). And in the novel there is a taboo on the pronunciation of the patriarchs name (I never knew his name). The third commandment is, do not say the Lords name in vain, over time, the Jews in general prestanut ever say it. Marquez also does not mention the name, thereby rendering the sacred figure of the patriarch. We will write a custom essay sample on The Autumn of the Patriarch Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Autumn of the Patriarch Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Autumn of the Patriarch Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer None of the residents of the state already do not remember what it was before the Board of General (patriarch). It is not known the birth of the patriarch, he is the first person in the state, on earth (Adam), possibly older than the Lord God. Hence, the way traced atheistic position of the patriarch. Marquez goes creates a divine patriarch, which in turn is not a believer, however, it is the very proof of sacredness and divinity. There is another version: that God made with the patriarch of the contract to the board (Avraaam), for so long, that comes to mind immediately, as people lived in ancient times in the Old Testament. The novels plot is present and then (v, hurricane), and the ruler as the savior of all living things (Noah) Bendison Alvarado -. Patriarch mother, she an amazing character. Here the author refers to the Virgin Mary. This is especially revealed after her death, when his son wants to spend her canonization, because of the sanctity and purity of his mother in the world, but not for the reason that shes a mother ruler of the country. However, it is most holy to do this is not possible, as all the miracles that power Bendison Alvarado, are a myth. Marquez manages to achieve and special perception of time. The plot unfolds if not in time, not someone conditional time with conventional characters and events. Sometimes the thrill author mentions the real area (Caribbean, etc.) and actually existing individuals The lack of titles and rare division into paragraphs, not only does the novel less dynamic, but also on the structure creates a semblance of a rhizome:. There is some form a labyrinth within which the symbolic links without central plot clearly expressed. This creates unexpected distinction of reality and myth. Thus, in the novel there is the rejection of the principles of historicism and determinism. Myth-making is also the concept of the norm. All action heroes are absolutely normal and there is no judgment, no moral or aesthetic, nor any other. Marquez writes about the beautiful and dirty (eg. As a man dies in his own shit). Many readers it scares and thus they do not accept the unscrupulousness of the writer and create unconsciously dogmatic myth of the novel. In the novel, the author is not the beginning. Depersonalization occurs roles, which leads the story. The reader is hard to catch whose words he is reading, if we are lucky, we can see the thoughts of Marquez. This is largely achieved by the almost complete absence of direct and indirect speech, it seemed immured in the text itself. According to poststructuralist Michel Foucault power is a kind of knowledge. Marquez perfectly shows that the head of state is the lack of knowledge, and professional bureaucracy is the concentration of knowledge. ruler naivety does not make him a bloodthirsty, hes a great kid, and a dictator who controls the state is a bureaucracy. She and the people have created the myth of the ruler, who ruled for hundreds of years, but which probably never happened. Later, Jean-Franà §ois Lyotard would call it metanarratsiey when the power turns knowledge into a myth.